A series of events that
discombobulate
Several years ago, my
staff added a Saturday night dinner and 15-minute speech at an event
honoring Eagle Scouts. A rule I generally try
to follow during the session is I'm allowed to work 24 hours a day
five days a week but the weekend is for family and home. But
exceptions are made and staff knew without asking I'd want to make
an exception for the
scouts.
That Saturday I sat
down and jotted out talking points designed to encourage teens to
think of a career in public service. That theme, I thought, was
pertinent as these young men, who had already made some good
decisions in the past, were beginning to make decisions about their
future.
When I arrived at the
dinner that evening, public service career talking points tucked
into the inner pocket of my suit jacket, I was met by an exuberant
older fellow. In the course of draping heavy strings of Mardi Gras
beads around my neck, he simultaneously welcomed me to the New
Orleans-themed annual dinner of delegates from the Alaska aeries of
the Fraternal Order of Eagles. Shortly after, a nice woman who
wanted to talk politics spilled red wine on my tie and white shirt.
(Spilling the wine didn't bother her at all--there was plenty more
where that came from.)
So,
seated at the head table between a visiting Eagle dignitary from
some state in the middle part of America and an Alaska Eagle
officer, I scratched out my talking point advice for a career in
public service and tried to pencil in comments more fitting to the
very celebratory occasion. My new remarks that night were
forgettable but I do remember my speech Monday morning when I
suggested to staff that more care needed to be given to correctly
defining the nature of the events they schedule. I told them I now
knew there were at least three kinds of Eagles: the clan shared by
many of our neighbors and the two that had gotten confused on the
schedule--scouts and aeries. I knew the first two far better than
the last one.
I tell this
rather long story to explain that the discombobulated feeling I had
for a few hours that long-ago Saturday night is similar to the
feeling I've had now for the past few weeks. Look at the
discombobulating events of the last month:
the governor gets bounced in the
primary, landing as hard primary night as Eddie "The Eagle"
Edwards (that awkward and goofy British plasterer who gained fame
as Britain's first and only Olympic ski jumper) often did during
the '88 Olympics;
- half the Prudhoe Bay oil production is
shut down because of pipeline corrosion issues that "surprised"
BP, the field operator;
- the price of Alaska's oil in the
market keeps dropping to the point it is now $16 less than the
midsummer price;
- the FBI raids six legislative offices,
apparently looking for links between money and policy decisions;
and
- the managers of state and municipal
public employee and teacher pension funds drop a half-billion
dollar collection notice on employers of Alaskans that deliver
services around the state.
Whew!
Perhaps
the only good news in all this is that Alaskans get to hire their
CEO and board of directors in just 45 days. The general election
races for governor and for state legislators are, fundamentally, a
job interview process. And Alaskans, if they so desire, get to do
the interviews and participate in the hiring. I hope they so
desire.
I'll 'fess up--I have
a stake in all this because I am being interviewed for rehire.
Nonetheless, I have some suggested interview
questions.
It's too simple to
say that Prudhoe is partially closed because of pipeline corrosion.
So those who want to guide the state on your behalf should be asked:
"did the state fail in its responsibility to regulate the field and
should BP be allowed to deduct the cost of its failures from state
taxes?"
Nearly 90 percent of
Alaska's general fund budget is based on oil. So those who want to
guide the state on your behalf should be asked: "what are you doing
to make other economic sectors more robust and what's your fallback
position if the price of oil slips below $53/barrel--the level on
which state spending in this fiscal year is
predicated?"
The FBI and IRS
are plumbing the relationship between some elected Alaska officials
and money. So those who want to guide the state on your behalf
should be asked, if they're incumbents; "did you vote to loosen
rules on lobbyist reporting and on campaign contribution limits?"
Additionally, "did you vote for laws making it tougher to file
ethics complaints against elected and appointed state officials?"
Challengers should be asked if they "will champion reform measures
rather than protect
officials."
The legislature
dramatically changed retirement programs in a manner that makes it
harder to recruit and retain talented teachers, police officers and
other public servants. It was necessary, proponents said, to avoid
future economic problems. Make way for one of those future economic
problems the changes were supposed to help us avoid.
The state is passing a $505 million retirement
cost increase on to public employers, including school districts and
cities (those local employer costs, if not paid by the state, will
reduce services and/or drive up local taxes). So those who want to
guide the state on your behalf should be asked: "why is the
employers' cost hikes far higher than what the state's contract
actuary recommended and why did the governor and legislature spend
so much time reducing benefits for new employees instead of
controlling soaring health care bills that really are driving system
costs?"
These are just some
of the questions prompted by current events. Remember, though, that
none of the answers is simplistic enough to fit in a 30-second TV
spot.
 Phone: (907) 465-4947
Fax: (907) 465-2108 Mail: Sen. Kim
Elton, State Capitol Juneau, AK 99801
Got a scoop? Call or email your
tips and suggestions to any of the email addresses
below:
|
Capitol Undercurrents
A grand time?--Which current legislative
staffer and which former legislative lawyer recently received
notices summoning them to Anchorage for a possible 18-month tour of
duty on a federal grand jury that, potentially, could be hearing
cases resulting from FBI raids on legislative offices?
So that's what "toss-up"
means--After a hand recount of
one precinct, a hand recount of the entire
house district, a review of challenged ballots by the Alaska Supreme
Court, and the counting of two previously uncounted ballots this
morning, it's a tie. Western Alaska and Aleutian Chain incumbent
Carl Moses and primary challenger Bryce Edgmon will apparently have
their race decided after a coin is tossed up--probably Monday
morning.
Greenback
dependency--Republican U.S. Senator Tom Coburn is: a
combative foe of "bridges to nowhere"; Ted Stevens' frequent budget
nemesis; and a fellow who can turn quite a phrase. He told the
Christian Science Monitor recently that congressional "earmarks are
a gateway drug on the road to spending addiction."
Grounded--If my high
school grades were as bad as the grades our university system got
from the
National Center for Public Policy and Higher
Education, I'd have been grounded by my parents. The center graded
all states' universities and colleges on: how well does the state
prepare students for education beyond high school (Alaska got a B-);
whether state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in
education and training beyond high school (C+); how affordable
higher education is for students and families (F); whether students
make progress toward and complete their certificates in a timely
manner (F); and what benefits does the state receive from having a
highly educated population (B-). Just a couple of notes--only one
other state got an 'F' on completion (Nevada) and our 'F' in
affordability comes as Alaska's university regents debate today
another 7 percent tuition increase after raising tuition 10 percent
each year since 2003.